5 Billboard Examples Tested Against Ego and Reality
Billboard ads get praised when they look good up close or sound like a great idea in a meeting. This article uses the same analysis procedure on five real, publicly visible billboards to show what survives real-world viewing conditions and what does not.
Example 1: AM Radio Billboard (Grade C)
This example shows how high-contrast copy can still struggle when the layout and hierarchy compete with the photo.
Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap
Scores
Readability68%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition75%
CTA80%
What’s Working
Contrast is a standout strength in this design
Strong color contrast helps copy hold up at distance
Top Fixes
Shorten copy so it can be understood quickly at typical viewing distance
Reduce competing elements to improve hierarchy and focus
Example 2: “OOPS” Divorce Attorneys (Grade B)
Big, bold wordmark leads the story, but the supporting line becomes the weak link at speed.
Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap
Scores
Readability100%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition80%
CTA70%
What’s Working
Readability is a standout strength in this design
Contrast is strong and supports distance viewing
Top Fixes
CTA is present, but needs more dominance (bigger, bolder, or higher contrast)
Increase clarity and simplify supporting information for speed
Example 3: Porsche Billboard (Grade B)
Clean headline + strong visuals. The heatmap favors the CTA area because it’s the highest-contrast text block.
Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap
Scores
Readability90%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition80%
CTA80%
What’s Working
High contrast supports distance legibility
Primary message stays readable in Speed View
Top Fixes
Improve clarity by reducing minor competing detail
Make CTA slightly more dominant if it’s the business goal
Example 4: Nitro Pepsi (Grade C)
Strong brand assets, but multiple text zones compete. Speed View shows the “split attention” problem clearly.
Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap
Scores
Readability75%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition75%
CTA70%
What’s Working
Contrast is a standout strength in this design
Text is concise and readable (relative to typical cluttered OOH)
Strong color contrast helps copy hold up at distance
Top Fixes
CTA is present, but needs more dominance (bigger, bolder, or higher contrast)
Consider reducing word count for faster comprehension
Refine color palette for stronger brand recall
Example 5: Chipotle “Short Headlines” (Grade B)
This is the perfect “data vs opinion” teaching moment: the big black words win. The faded background line exists, but it’s not what the brain keeps.
Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap
Scores
Readability100%
Contrast88%
Clarity72%
Colors65%
Composition75%
CTA80%
What’s Working
Readability is a standout strength in this design
Text is concise and readable
Strong contrast helps the key words hold up at distance
Top Fixes
CTA is present, but needs more dominance (bigger, bolder, or higher contrast)
Improve color harmony and brand consistency
Increase whitespace for a cleaner visual hierarchy
Disclaimer: These examples are provided for educational purposes only. Images may be sourced from public photographs or screenshots of real-world billboards, and may not match original production files in resolution, lighting, angle, or compression. Results demonstrate how Ad Corrector evaluates visual legibility, hierarchy, and attention behavior under typical real-world viewing conditions. This content is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any featured brand.