DATA VS OPINION

5 Billboard Examples Tested Against Ego and Reality

Billboard ads get praised when they look good up close or sound like a great idea in a meeting. This article uses the same analysis procedure on five real, publicly visible billboards to show what survives real-world viewing conditions and what does not.

Example 1: AM Radio Billboard (Grade C)

This example shows how high-contrast copy can still struggle when the layout and hierarchy compete with the photo.

Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap

Scores

Readability68%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition75%
CTA80%

What’s Working

  • Contrast is a standout strength in this design
  • Strong color contrast helps copy hold up at distance

Top Fixes

  • Shorten copy so it can be understood quickly at typical viewing distance
  • Reduce competing elements to improve hierarchy and focus

Example 2: “OOPS” Divorce Attorneys (Grade B)

Big, bold wordmark leads the story, but the supporting line becomes the weak link at speed.

Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap

Scores

Readability100%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition80%
CTA70%

What’s Working

  • Readability is a standout strength in this design
  • Contrast is strong and supports distance viewing

Top Fixes

  • CTA is present, but needs more dominance (bigger, bolder, or higher contrast)
  • Increase clarity and simplify supporting information for speed

Example 3: Porsche Billboard (Grade B)

Clean headline + strong visuals. The heatmap favors the CTA area because it’s the highest-contrast text block.

Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap

Scores

Readability90%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition80%
CTA80%

What’s Working

  • High contrast supports distance legibility
  • Primary message stays readable in Speed View

Top Fixes

  • Improve clarity by reducing minor competing detail
  • Make CTA slightly more dominant if it’s the business goal

Example 4: Nitro Pepsi (Grade C)

Strong brand assets, but multiple text zones compete. Speed View shows the “split attention” problem clearly.

Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap

Scores

Readability75%
Contrast100%
Clarity72%
Colors75%
Composition75%
CTA70%

What’s Working

  • Contrast is a standout strength in this design
  • Text is concise and readable (relative to typical cluttered OOH)
  • Strong color contrast helps copy hold up at distance

Top Fixes

  • CTA is present, but needs more dominance (bigger, bolder, or higher contrast)
  • Consider reducing word count for faster comprehension
  • Refine color palette for stronger brand recall

Example 5: Chipotle “Short Headlines” (Grade B)

This is the perfect “data vs opinion” teaching moment: the big black words win. The faded background line exists, but it’s not what the brain keeps.

Grade + Scores + Fixes
Speed View
Attention Heatmap

Scores

Readability100%
Contrast88%
Clarity72%
Colors65%
Composition75%
CTA80%

What’s Working

  • Readability is a standout strength in this design
  • Text is concise and readable
  • Strong contrast helps the key words hold up at distance

Top Fixes

  • CTA is present, but needs more dominance (bigger, bolder, or higher contrast)
  • Improve color harmony and brand consistency
  • Increase whitespace for a cleaner visual hierarchy
Disclaimer: These examples are provided for educational purposes only. Images may be sourced from public photographs or screenshots of real-world billboards, and may not match original production files in resolution, lighting, angle, or compression. Results demonstrate how Ad Corrector evaluates visual legibility, hierarchy, and attention behavior under typical real-world viewing conditions. This content is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any featured brand.

OOH Pre-Flight Creative Checklist

Opens in a new tab. Print-ready.
Dan Resnikoff Ad Corrector
Author: Dan Resnikoff
Principal Billboard Strategist
Connect: Ad Corrector | LinkedIn

Featured On